Sunday, October 10, 2010

Kiswahili wins more popularity



Rodrick anakipenda kiswahili wewe je?



KISWAHILI is spoken by more than 100 million people in various parts of the world, placing it in the list of the fastest growing languages across the globe, according to a random survey by Radio France International. 

Speaking to the 'Sunday News' in an exclusive interview in Dar es Salaam recently, the RFI Director of International Relations, Mr John Maguire, said that Kiswahili is predominantly spoken in East Africa followed by Central Africa, Middle East, Europe and the United States. 

He said that the study had confirmed that Tanzania with a population of over 40 million people was using Swahili as its first language. "Everyone in Tanzania speaks Kiswahili which is considered to be a lingua franca," he said. 

He also said that half of Kenya's population which stands at 35 million people can speak Kiswahili as second language, while a quarter of the 25 million people in Uganda, which is not their first language speaks the language too. 

However, a fraction of Burundi and Rwandan population speaks Kiswahili while some people in the Democratic Republic of Congo and other Central African states also use Kiswahili though not as their first language. 

"These small numbers of Kiswahili speakers in Europe, America and Middle East add up to the aggregate number of over 100 million people, some of whom are using Kiswahili as their second language," he added. 

"It is not necessary that a person should be speaking Kiswahili as his/her first language, but it is about one being able to communicate in Kiswahili," he stressed. 

He also said that Kiswahili was already recognized by the African Union and in many parts of the world, thus making it popular even in Europe and the United States. 

Experts in Kiswahili language have cautioned Tanzanians to be careful when using the language because many people assume that other nationals did not understand the language. 
Journalists who were attending a workshop recently remarked that it is no longer the case to think that a Mzungu will not catch up with you when you use Kiswahili. 

This journalist has seen a number of western diplomats who are fluent in Kiswahili and according to them, they spent more than a year training while in the United States or Europe before being accredited to Tanzania. 

Last month, when celebrating its official inauguration of Kiswahili services in Dar es Salaam, the Chief Executive Officer of RFI, Ms Christine Ockrent, said that Tanzania is where Kiswahili is based and nurtured and developed extensively. 

She also said that RFI broadcast in eleven other languages and the latest being Kiswahili service as it launched operations in July in Dar es Salaam in partnership with Tanzania Broadcasting Corporation. 

"We surveyed many possibilities before we decided to be based in Dar es Salalam. It was also the quality of partnership with TBC and qualification of good Kiswahili that favoured Tanzania. Of course political stability was the other aspect that led to our decision to pick Dar es Salaam as our base," she said.

SOURCE: http://dailynews.co.tz/home/?n=13677&cat=home

Friday, October 08, 2010

Karagwe hapatatosha KAHANGWA ndani ya ulingo


Kulingana na taarifa ya TUME ya Taifa ya Uchaguzi (NEC), mwezi uliopita ilieleza kuwa imetupilia mbali pingamizi alilowekewa mgombea ubunge wa jimbo la Karagwe kupitia Chadema, Deusdedith Kahangwa. Awali Kahangwa aliwekewa pingamizi hilo na CCM na NCCR Mageuzi ambavyo vilidai kuwa mgombea huyo hakudhaminiwa na chama chake na kuwa alijaza majina yake katika sehemu iliyotakiwa kujazwa na Katibu wa chama hicho. Madai mengine katika pingamizi hilo ni kutodhaminiwa na wanachama, ambayo yamepuuzwa na Nec kuwa hayana msingi. “Kama wanachama walirubuniwa kumdhamini, basi walipaswa kupeleka malalamiko yao kwa Msimamizi wa Uchaguzi kabla ya pingamizi kupelekwa kwa msimamizi huyo,” ilieleza barua hiyo ya Nec. Kuhusu madai kwamba mgombea hakudhaminiwa na wapiga kura, Nec imesema kuwa fomu zinaonesha kuwa Kahangwa amedhaminiwa na wapiga kura 31 na msimamizi wa uchaguzi alithibitisha hivyo. Kushinda rufaa kwa Kahangwa jimboni humo, kunatazamiwa kuleta chachu ya ushindani wa kisiasa kwani Chadema inaonekana kuwa na nguvu zaidi ya vyama vingine vya upinzani jimboni humo.

WANA KARAGWE TUUNGANE KWA PAMOJA KUMCHA BWANA DEUSDEDITH KAHANGWA KAMA MBUNGE WETU WA JIMBO LA KARAGWE..

DOES LIFE HAS ANY PURPOSE ????


Do you ever dream of a perfect world? Imagine the whole earth is at peace. The land is clean and beautiful. Wild animals are abundant and yet friendly. They are not afraid of man, for no one ever abuses them. Everyone is honest and kind. Mates are faithful and children are loved. Everyone is happy to serve for the good of all. No one has to slave long hours for low wages. No powerful elite exploits the weak. Things are made to last and are repairable, and are recycled when no longer needed. People are responsible and take care of their belongings. Of course there still is work to do, but it is shared fairly. All have time to travel and visit, to develop artistic interests and hobbies. Everyone is healthy, there is no need of doctors, medicines or insurance. In this perfect world, everyone stays young! Can you imagine such a world?

Throughout history people have dreamt of making life perfect, but no one has been able to do it. Politicians always promise a better life for all if they win office, but their greatest skill seems to be spending vast amounts of money. Scientists sometimes predict a grand new world will come from their research, and it is true, modern technology has improved life in many ways. Yet science has also brought us fiendish weapons of war, high-pressure working conditions, and devastating pollution. In fact, the world is now in serious trouble, particularly in the area of human relations. Sexual perversions are widely accepted. Many marriages are harsh and brief, and many children are neglected and abused. Even small children commit violent crimes with no trace of pity or remorse. Ethnic and religious wars rage on for years. Billions of decent, hardworking people live in miserable poverty, while a few who do very little work live in luxury.

So you might dismiss ideas of a "perfect world" as foolish dreaming. Yet we cannot help but long for such a life. Why does life have to be so insecure, so troubled, so short? What prevents real progress?

A look at the natural world makes us wonder. There is so much that is beautiful: intricate flowers with delicate colors and delightful scents, brightly colored birds singing cheerful songs, glorious yet subtle shades of magnificent sunsets! Have you watched kittens or puppies playing, or studied the wings of a butterfly? What potential life has for enjoyment and delight!
Yet even in the natural world there is predation, parasitism, pestilence, poison and pain. No, wilderness is not a paradise. So is it foolish to think it could ever be made so?

WHY WE CAN BELIEVE
For an answer we must turn to the question, why does life exist at all? Is there a purpose to existence? Or are we just a product of chance, of mindless evolution? Perhaps you have asked that question at some time.
If life has a purpose, then there must be a Purposer, One who brought life into existence for a reason. Further, in creating life, this One would have designed it able to fulfill that purpose.

When we examine living things, do we see evidence of design? Indeed we do. As the science of biology advances, scientists have become more and more impressed by life’s complexity, its intricacy of interconnecting processes and materials. Some scientists even dare to confess, despite an environment in the scientific community that is openly hostile to such heresy, that surely there must have been a Designer for what they see.
Let us consider two examples of design: First, think about reproduction. Two special cells, a sperm and an egg, join and merge their DNA material. From this a "plan" is created, which controls rapid growth that is both precisely timed and positioned. Organs, nerves, bones, muscles and other specialized tissue all develop to form a new living being. Not long after being born, some creatures (such as antelope) are able to get up and run faster than a man. This requires vision and coordination that scientists have yet to imitate even in a clumsy fashion with their robots. Surely this requires a Designer!

This DNA "plan" also creates the brain, our second example. A human brain occupies only .05 cubic foot (1.4 liter), yet all our awareness, imagination, and understanding is contained in it. All the knowledge we have learned fits in there. All the skills we have mastered are controlled there. Scientists have no idea how that is accomplished; yet we certainly do not deny that it happens. Nor does it appear that we have begun to challenge the brain’s capacity in a full lifetime of 80 years; if its health is maintained, one’s mind can be as sharp and active and able to learn at 100 as at 20. This alone should convince us that life was not meant to be so short. Surely such a marvelous creation would require careful design!
Another marvel about the DNA "plan" has recently been discovered: there is an amazingly reliable repair system constantly guarding the integrity of the code. When damaged DNA is detected, molecules that act like micromachines go to work, snipping the damaged segment out, fetching a copy of the correct replacement, and stitching it in. Those who look at this and say "it designed itself by hit-or-miss" are marvels themselves— of blindness!

The fact that the genetic code contains a "plan" is substantial evidence that there must be a Planner, a Designer, a Purposer. We can rightly call this One "God", which means "powerful one." Believing he exists should give us hope, for such a God would surely not abandon his creations forever to wonder and grope blindly for its purpose.

HAS THIS GOD MADE HIMSELF KNOWN?

Mankind has always instinctively sensed that there is a higher power or Deity. That is why there is no culture on earth lacking a religious tradition. There are thousands of religions worldwide. Most of these involve just minor variations of beliefs or ritual. There are perhaps 7 major branches of religion, involving more significant differences in belief, yet even these teach many similar ideas. Can God be found in any or all of them?
Every religion attempts to explain the purpose of life in some way, although a few in effect say there is no real "purpose" as such. For example, the Hindu family of religions teaches reincarnation, in which life is a continual cycle of birth, death, and rebirth, ending, if ever, only in a state of nothingness or unconsciousness. In this view, any one individual cannot hope to live forever as himself, having a lasting purpose as an individual. Other religions say that the purpose of life is to get saved and go to Heaven at death. One teaches that we all may become Gods in time, if we do well.
The religious situation is so complex and confusing that many today choose not to discuss it. They may say, "You believe what you want to believe, I’ll believe what I want, and we’ll both be happy." This is a tolerant, relaxed philosophy. It is certainly better than fighting. But should we be satisfied with that as the best possible solution?
Jesus, known the world over as a man who claimed to be sent by God, said he had come "to bear witness to the truth." (John 18.37) This prompted a skeptical, worldly-wise man, Pontius Pilate, to retort, "What is truth?" Apparently he felt like many do today, that no one could claim to know the truth. Was he right?
Truth is definite. It involves drawing conclusions, and it excludes opposing opinions as untrue, false, wrong. Many today are uncomfortable doing that. Philosophers in particular seem to be uncomfortable coming to definite conclusions. They love dilemmas and paradoxes, such as "Everything I say is false." Yet some things are self-evident; for example, as Rene Descartes said, "I think, therefore I am." (He had to study on it at great length to reach that conclusion, however. He was a philosopher, after all.) Some moderns feel sophisticated because they have "advanced" to the point of doubting their own existence. More simple-minded folk like you and I still believe we exist, and other such foolishness.
Science is the search for knowledge of the physical world, that which can be sensed and measured. Men have put a great deal of time and energy into that search, and over centuries a considerable body of proven knowledge has been accumulated. Scientific research is based on the assumption that truth exists and can be discovered.
Likewise, there must be truth about God. Either he exists, or he does not. Either life has a purpose, or it does not. It is not reasonable to say both can be true. So we should not be satisfied with the philosophy "Truth is whatever you believe", that is so often applied in religious matters.
To some, faith and religion means fervently believing things that cannot be proven, even things that don't make rational sense. For them it is enough for religion to satisfy the emotions, to "feel right" or make them feel good. To try to understand it, to make sense of it, seems irreverent, impious. (Or just way too much work...) This attitude causes others to ridicule faith. But is this true religion?
Where and how should one search for truth about God and the meaning of life? A scientist doing research considers what he knows already, so as to establish a reasonable course of inquiry. We have already looked at creation, which tells us a few valuable things about its Designer. He must have tremendous power. He is very precise; all things work together according to exact laws. He has a sense of beauty and a sense of humor. He must be infinitely more intelligent than we are.
But here we have an advantage over the scientist. God is no mere rock or dumb animal, even though some religions depict him that way. (Romans 1:22,23) He can rightly be expected to speak up and make himself known. So in our search, we should look for actual communication from him.
We can reasonably assume that God’s communication should have begun long ago and by now be widely available. Further, since the truth we are seeking is not the kind that changes with time, we should look for a message that has been recorded, written down, rather than at shifting oral legends and traditions. Of all the "holy writings" that claim to be God’s revelation to man, is there one which meets our reasonable expectations?
Most "sacred texts" do not even directly address the matter of who God is, nor do they offer hope for a better future. Some depict their deity as having rapacious qualities, such that if we were to follow the deity’s example, the world would be worse than it is. This is clearly not what we are looking for.
About one quarter of the earth’s population belongs to the "Judeo-Christian" branch of religions. Like the others, it is fragmented into thousands of contentious sects. The one book they all purport to accept is called "the Holy Scriptures" or the "Bible". This common confession has not proved sufficient to unite them. Even so, the Bible itself is a very unusual book.
As we would expect of a book from God, it is widely available: 98% of the world’s population can obtain one in their own language. Hundreds of millions have been printed. It has profoundly affected human history. For their loyalty to it, many have been forced to die; rather than deny it, many have willingly died. Its principles have been a source of wisdom in establishing the constitutions of nations. Truly, no one should consider himself well educated if he has never read it.
It depicts a God who is loving, compassionate, kind and forgiving, yet fear-inspiring, powerful beyond measure; a God we can appreciate and admire, even though he is beyond our full comprehension. He is exactly what we would expect, and more. If one carefully imitated this God, and obeyed his commands found in his book, the world would be vastly improved, even perfected. Wise men have acknowledged this. For example, during India’s struggle for independence from Britain, Mohandas K. Gandhi told the British viceroy of India: "When your country and mine shall get together on the teachings laid down by Christ in the Sermon on the Mount (found at Matthew 5-7), we shall have solved the problems, not only of our countries, but those of the whole world."
The Bible describes God as having an active interest in his creation. Besides helping those who look to him now, it says he will take dramatic action to remove evil, and establish a new world. (Rom 2.4-11, 2nd Peter 3.9-13) This should interest us greatly, particularly since this event is depicted as near at hand. There is a surprisingly large amount of material on this in the Bible, which we will consider at length in chapters 6-9.
If the Bible is from God, we should expect those who are now using it as a guide in their everyday lives to be more peaceful, honest, industrious, and purposeful. Yet many who claim to live by the Bible are not good examples of these things. Besides the divisiveness already mentioned, professed Christians have at times used the Bible to justify war, racism, slavery, and colonialism. (For proof that this is misuse of the scriptures, see James 4.1-3 and 5.1-6, Acts 10.34, 5,Philippians 2.1-4.) All too often, men who preach and praise the high ideals of the Bible are found to be hypocrites. ---Compare Rom 2.17-24.
This sorry state of affairs has convinced many that the Bible is not God’s book and that perhaps there is no God at all. But the fact that there are evil and hypocritical men who use a veneer of righteousness to advance their own selfish ends cannot bury the evidence that God exists. The Bible itself firmly condemns such men. --- Matthew 23.23-28.
On the other hand, those who truly learn and earnestly apply Bible standards find their lives transformed. They find contentment, a clear conscience, protection from many troubles, and ability to cope with stresses common to life. Their life has a purposefulness that helps them make decisions with good results. They show genuine concern and compassion for their fellowman. From the Bible we learn the simple purpose of living: to enjoy life together in a way that honors and pleases our Creator.* This involves our work, our leisure, our education, our relationships, the very focus of our existence. 

THREE QUESTIONS

1.Why do bad things happen to good people?
2.Why would God allow bad things to happen?
3.Why Must I Suffer?

There’s no totally satisfactory answer to these questions because evil and suffering are Divine mysteries. Philosophers and theologians have pondered these mysteries for thousands of years. There never has been nor will be complete answers this side of heaven.

Nonetheless, looking at theory can correct misconceptions about the role of God in suffering. It’s important to note the difference between moral and non-moral suffering. Moral suffering is suffering that we caused or could have prevented based on choices we made. Non-moral suffering comes from things that we didn't cause or couldn't prevent. This article addresses moral suffering.

Evil exists because God respects our freedom. When we suffer, we might conclude God doesn’t exist or doesn’t care. God granted us a freedom that even He won’t meddle with because He respects our freedom. Our freedom is necessary for love to be authentic. God loves every person He has created; He will not force His love on anyone and will allow them to choose against Him. Choosing against God involves the possibility of moral suffering and evil.

Our freedom to love involves risk. We risk suffering. It is a suffering to be forgotten by a friend who has picked new friends, suspected of wrongdoing by the person you love most, lied to by a friend, or slandered by co-workers. It is a suffering to be rejected because of who you are and for what you believe, dominated and used for someone else’s gratification, humiliated by a family member, tormented by guilt and shame from past mistakes, handicapped by physical illness, abandoned by the person you love most, or grieved by the death of a loved one.

There’s a tendency to blame God for suffering, especially suffering resulting from things outside of us, choices made by other people that affect us. If we’re honest, we can't blame God for this sort of suffering because it involves people making choices out of their own free will. God respects and protects our freedom to love so much that He risks us choosing not to love people and even not to love Him.

Isn’t there an exception? Can’t God coax our family, our sweetheart, our friends, and our co-workers to love us more? We perceive God as being silent because He allows our freedom to be non-coerced, even by Him. God does not intrude upon free will but can give Divine Influence. How He dispenses Divine Influence is also a mystery.


Our human capacity to understand this mystery is limited. This is a tough reality to make peace with. I do know God can ultimately redeem whatever goes wrong; herein lies my hope. Where evil, sin, and suffering abound God teaches me to respond that out of suffering we can create beautiful qualities that last forever. I’ve learned the only really satisfactory way of dealing with evil is not to simply bind it, but rather to overcome it with good.

Suffering gives us the opportunity to move beyond ourselves to create beautiful qualities that transform our hearts. Hidden in the poignancy of suffering is a choice. Will I turn inward to myself because my suffering is pointless and unbearable? Worse yet, will I deny the existence of my suffering altogether? Or will I open myself to the possibility of growth through embracing my suffering?

When suffering turns us in on ourselves, we seek instant pleasures in things, appearances, and egos. These pleasures only distract us momentarily; they can never satisfy suffering. We grieve God when we retreat into ourselves because He seeks to draw us out of ourselves to free us for service in truly great things.